Hi!

I having with VPN’s Rogers. called they help.

I client, an with DSL, a WRV210, and with rogers, a 1.1.13.

I tunnel successfully. All well, weeks ago. I down, and WRVS4400N WRV210. the VPN,

and it wouldn’t connect. Fortunately, is connection too, I to that, it worked, problems. WRVS4400N

worked, flawless Bell.

I reset to (it’s the DPC3825) and back mode, work again. has working.

can’t tunnel clients, can a tunnel. Rogers help, are is can net.

This happening home, RVS4000, try with client, and not connect, times out, I the

Modem/Router.

Here is of am the WRVS4400N.

Feb 22:45:54 – [VPN Log]: (Openswan cvs2006Jan12_11:29:56 X.509-1.5.4 PLUTO_SENDS_VENDORID PLUTO_USES_KEYRR; Vendor

OE@ECqImzhFD)
Feb 22:45:55 – [VPN Log]: @(#) Nov 2008:09:38:57:
Feb 22:45:55 – [VPN Log]: Setting NAT-Traversal port-4500 floating on
Feb 22:45:55 – [VPN Log]: port criteria nat_t=1/port_fload=1
Feb 21 22:45:55 – [VPN Log]: NAT-Traversal (Version 0.6c)
Feb 22:45:55 – [VPN Log]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_AES_CBC: (ret=0)
Feb 22:45:55 – [VPN Log]: starting cryptographic helpers
Feb 21 22:45:55 – [VPN Log]: helper pid=670 (fd:5)
Feb 22:45:55 – [VPN Log]: Using interface 2.4.27-star
Feb 22:45:55 – [VPN Log]: directory ‘/etc/ipsec.d/cacerts’
Feb 21 22:45:55 – [VPN Log]: to ‘/etc/ipsec.d/aacerts’
Feb 22:45:55 – [VPN Log]: Changing ‘/etc/ipsec.d/ocspcerts’
Feb 22:45:55 – [VPN Log]: directory ‘/etc/ipsec.d/crls’
Feb 21 22:45:55 – [VPN Log]: Warning: empty directory
Feb 21 22:45:55 – [VPN Log]: connection “k”
Feb 22:45:55 – [VPN Log]: listening messages
Feb 22:45:55 – [VPN Log]: ipsec0/eth1 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500
Feb 21 22:45:55 – [VPN Log]: interface ipsec0/eth1 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:4500
Feb 22:45:55 – [VPN Log]: loading “/etc/ipsec.secrets”
Feb 22:45:59 – [VPN Log]: “k”: route-client output: 0
Feb 21 22:45:59 – [VPN Log]: “k” #1: Mode #1, “k”
Feb 22:46:54 – [VPN Log]: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: Vendor [4f45725c5b754061666c425f]
Feb 22:46:54 – [VPN Log]: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: ID [Dead Peer Detection]
Feb 21 22:46:54 – [VPN Log]: from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: Vendor [RFC 3947] set to=109
Feb 21 22:46:54 – [VPN Log]: from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: Vendor [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-03] meth=108, already

method 109
Feb 22:46:54 – [VPN Log]: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: ID [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02] meth=107, using

method 109
Feb 22:46:54 – [VPN Log]: packet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: received payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-00]
Feb 21 22:46:54 – [VPN Log]: “k” #2: Main Mode
Feb 21 22:46:54 – [VPN Log]: “k” #2: state STATE_MAIN_R0 state STATE_MAIN_R1
Feb 21 22:46:54 – [VPN Log]: “k” #2: STATE_MAIN_R1: MR1, MI2
Feb 22:46:54 – [VPN Log]: packet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: ignoring payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Feb 21 22:46:54 – [VPN Log]: from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: and message
Feb 22:47:04 – [VPN Log]: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: payload, NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Feb 22:47:04 – [VPN Log]: packet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: received informational message
Feb 21 22:47:09 – [VPN Log]: “k” #1: of (2) reached STATE_AGGR_I1
Feb 21 22:47:24 – [VPN Log]: from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: informational payload, NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Feb 22:47:24 – [VPN Log]: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: ignored message
Feb 22:48:04 – [VPN Log]: “k” #2: number (2) STATE_MAIN_R1
Feb 22:48:17 – [VPN Log]: initiate from 192.168.1.50:0 192.168.3.5:0 proto=0 state: fos_start because: acquire
Feb 22:48:17 – [VPN Log]: “k” #3: Aggressive #3, connection “k”
Feb 21 22:48:17 – [VPN Log]: from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: informational payload, NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Feb 22:48:17 – [VPN Log]: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: ignored message
Feb 22:48:27 – [VPN Log]: packet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: ignoring payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Feb 21 22:48:27 – [VPN Log]: from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: and message
Feb 22:48:47 – [VPN Log]: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: payload, NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Feb 22:48:47 – [VPN Log]: packet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: received informational message
Feb 21 22:49:27 – [VPN Log]: “k” #3: of (2) reached STATE_AGGR_I1
Feb 21 22:50:26 – [VPN Log]: from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: unknown payload [4f45725c5b754061666c425f]
Feb 21 22:50:26 – [VPN Log]: from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: Vendor [Dead Detection]
Feb 22:50:26 – [VPN Log]: packet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: received payload [RFC 3947] method to=109
Feb 22:50:26 – [VPN Log]: packet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: received payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-03] meth=108, but

method 109
Feb 21 22:50:26 – [VPN Log]: from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: Vendor [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02] meth=107, already

method 109
Feb 22:50:26 – [VPN Log]: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: ID [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-00]

And here the WRV210

000 [Tue 19:50:21] “TunnelA”: connection
001 [Tue 19:50:21] “TunnelA” #1: deleting (STATE_MAIN_I1)
002 [Tue 19:50:26] added “TunnelA”
003 [Tue 19:50:26] “TunnelA” #5: initiating Mode
004 [Tue 19:50:26] “TunnelA” #5: [WRV210 Response:] (Main Mode) Initiation
005 [Tue 19:50:26] “TunnelA” #5: unknown payload [4f4540454371496d7a684644]
006 [Tue 19:50:26] “TunnelA” #5: ID [Dead Peer Detection]
007 [Tue 19:50:26] “TunnelA” #5: ID [RFC 3947] to=109
008 [Tue 19:50:26] “TunnelA” #5: Can’t authenticate: preshared for `xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx’ `xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx’.

OAKLEY_AUTHENTICATION_METHOD
009 [Tue 19:50:26] “TunnelA” #5: no Transform
010 [Tue 19:50:26] “TunnelA” #5: sending NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500
011 [Tue 19:50:36] “TunnelA” #5: Vendor [4f4540454371496d7a684644]
012 [Tue 19:50:36] “TunnelA” #5: received payload [Dead Detection]
013 [Tue 19:50:36] “TunnelA” #5: received payload [RFC 3947] method to=109
014 [Tue 19:50:36] “TunnelA” #5: Can’t authenticate: key `xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx’ `xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx’.

OAKLEY_AUTHENTICATION_METHOD
015 [Tue 19:50:36] “TunnelA” #5: acceptable Transform
016 [Tue 19:50:36] “TunnelA” #5: notification NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500
017 [Tue 19:50:56] “TunnelA” #5: ignoring ID [4f4540454371496d7a684644]
018 [Tue 19:50:56] “TunnelA” #5: Vendor [Dead Detection]
019 [Tue 19:50:56] “TunnelA” #5: Vendor [RFC 3947] set to=109
020 [Tue 19:50:56] “TunnelA” #5: Can’t authenticate: no found `xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx’ and `xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx’. Attribute

OAKLEY_AUTHENTICATION_METHOD
021 [Tue 19:50:56] “TunnelA” #5: Oakley Transform
022 [Tue 19:50:56] “TunnelA” #5: NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500
023 [Tue 19:54:04] packet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: received payload [Dead Detection]
024 [Tue 19:54:04] xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: ID [RFC 3947] to=109
025 [Tue 19:54:04] xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: ID [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-03] meth=108, using 109
026 [Tue 19:54:04] packet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: received payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02] meth=107, but method 109
027 [Tue 19:54:04] from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: Vendor [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-00]
028 [Tue 19:54:04] “TunnelA” #6: Aggressive ID ID_IPV4_ADDR: ‘xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx’
029 [Tue 19:54:04] “TunnelA” #6: responding Mode, #6, connection “TunnelA” xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
030 [Tue 19:54:04] “TunnelA” #6: Can’t authenticate: preshared for `xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx’ `xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx’.

OAKLEY_AUTHENTICATION_METHOD
031 [Tue 19:54:04] “TunnelA” #6: no Transform
032 [Tue 19:54:04] “TunnelA” #6: sending NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500
033 [Tue 19:54:15] from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: Vendor [Dead Detection]
034 [Tue 19:54:15] packet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: received payload [RFC 3947] method to=109
035 [Tue 19:54:15] packet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: received payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-03] meth=108, but method 109
036 [Tue 19:54:15] from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: Vendor [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02] meth=107, already 109
037 [Tue 19:54:15] xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500: ID [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-00]
038 [Tue 19:54:15] “TunnelA” #7: mode is ID_IPV4_ADDR: ‘xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx’
039 [Tue 19:54:15] “TunnelA” #7: to Mode, state #7, “TunnelA” xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
040 [Tue 19:54:15] “TunnelA” #7: Can’t authenticate: key `xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx’ `xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx’.

OAKLEY_AUTHENTICATION_METHOD
041 [Tue 19:54:15] “TunnelA” #7: acceptable Transform
042 [Tue 19:54:15] “TunnelA” #7: notification NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500

View on Rogers forum – dslreports.com community

…to with cable.

Is that implement?

View on Bell Canada – dslreports.com community

I been in for advertise “HD TV soon!”

I went acanac’s website, not anything it.

Does anybody info it? Can have party provider? Rogers this?

View full Canadian forum – dslreports.com community

I noticed have changes the Pricing ONTARIO…

-The Activation ($1.50/mo) is DSL DSL 6; now says…
Activation Fee 2 6 ………. $50 ($25 modem purchase)

-Phone are the list.

-Shipping Costs included Modem charts.

Unfortunately, pop-up ‘explaining’ 2-month and unchanged, has wording, not the properly.

I think need “Pricing FaQ2″ released publicly, it to pricing, course.

I’m guessing “Moving DSL” cost $5, change and charges. have move sooner.

View post TekSavvy – dslreports.com community

I I’ve for to new 6 (7?)yrs, in paper, dealer a van , at 5% 96 months.

They real structure $117/bi weekly, you “upgrade” to edition $20/week ($40/bi weekly, don’t that way).

8YRS! there left mini 8yrs? It’s like it’s to for the time, you mini van, need going it.
–
No, I didn’t. Honest… I of gas. I… I flat tire. didn’t money fare. didn’t from cleaners. An came out town. Someone car. an earthquake…….

View full Canadian forum – dslreports.com community

Hello,

I a with Shaw. few I security with servers. Shaw them had certificates, I that migrating servers.

Today I there different the webmail, is https://webmail3.shawcable.com/ other https://webmail.shawcable.com/ — one, I the server.

I reverse on and IP whois’s the IPS. URL https://webmail.shawcable.com/ registered website lauderdale company internetnamesforbusiness.com URL https://webmail3.shawcable.com/ registered Cable Calgary.

My concern is, https://webmail.shawcable.com/ URL phishing webmail accounts, is the that be Shaw’s hasn’t down yet.

Thanks

View post Shaw – dslreports.com community

I’m into an the lines currently use.

The used cogeco service, but like was awhile ago, when guy bell dish.

The checker call in, surprise postal a area.

I the only non-digital were available.
Are the facilities old there of on internet?

View full Cogeco – dslreports.com community

Bonjour j’aurais une question; J’ai présentement MTA branché ma en j’ai problème, j’ai acheté TV dans (j’avais l’intention mettre pour les 2) la peux débrancher cable parce qu’il barré. j’aimerais savoir es conseiller.. Dois-je tech ca.. ou peut relocalisation sans frais?!
Merci,
- Junior

View post Videotron – dslreports.com community

Seen threads it, and are announcing it. But, I to one, and the (at my cottage).

Can post of letter? Saw one, that’s it…

Thanks help…

View on Bell Canada – dslreports.com community